Just stam a picture of some random Haredim because I like pictures in my blog posts. Credit: Wiki Commons |
Let's take a couple of steps back. We're currently less than two weeks before local council election day, which in Beit Shemesh pits incumbent mayor Moshe Abutbul against challengers Aliza Bloch and Malachi someone-or-other. The fundamentals of the debate are as follows: the Bloch camp claims that Abutbul has done a bad job as mayor, and she will do better; the Abutbul camp claims that he is Haredi and the Gedolim say you must therefore vote for him. And the third guy says something, I think.
I'm not going to bother with analyzing the Bloch camp's arguments, because there are many points to be made in both directions, and it is a fair matter for debate whether Bloch would be a better mayor than Abutbul. Abutbul's claims, however, are incontrovertible: he is verifiably Haredi, and I have no reason to believe he's lying about the endorsements he claims to have received from all the senior Rabbonim that the Haredi community cares about. To simplify it further: Bloch is appealing to voters' reason, while Abutbul is appealing to their identity. And identity always trumps reason, in terms of persuasion.
Incumbent mayor Moshe Abutbul Credit: Times of Israel |
This situation is profoundly saddening to me, not because of the likely outcome, but because the election will be decided on tribalism rather than issues. That's not a good thing for a democratic society. But it will continue this way, election after election, as long as the non-Haredi sector keeps putting up candidates who are inherently doomed to fail.
But it's not all bad news. At some point, perhaps even in five years' time, the non-Haredi sector will give up, thus firmly establishing Beit Shemesh as a Haredi-controlled city. At that point, only Haredi candidates will be viable. Consequently, there will be nothing to compete about in terms of tribal identity, which is the most important area to the dominant voting bloc. What's left? They'll actually have to compete on real issues. Wow.
Good news for the Jews! Credit: Times of Israel |
My purpose in writing this is not to convince anyone to vote differently. You should vote for whoever you think is the best candidate. But when Abutbul wins handily, don't lose heart. The bigger his victory margin, the better for all of us, because only when we learn to accept and live with the new reality, that Beit Shemesh is a Haredi-majority city, do we have a chance of moving past tribalism and into meritocracy.
4 comments:
But it is inconceivable for someone who cares about honesty and good governance to vote for a Mayor who Misrad hapanim has declared is totally mismanaging funds and only hires relatives of those that work in the city council. Read the Mevaker hamedina's report. If an honest person can't support that behaviour , what do you recommend for them?
Unknown: I don't understand your question. If you can't support the one candidate, then vote for the other, no?
I am not sure why you think tribalism will end with an only chareidi mayortorial display. Each one will go to their leader and get their endorsement. It will end up a war between the misnagdim, chassidim, and sefardim. Or between ashkenazim in general and sefardim in general, or between different branches of the yeshivushe olam. Tribalism ends when ppl learn to give a damn about the place they in. And to do that you to educate. Reason might take longer, but if handled properly it will win in the end.
The first time I read this it seemed to be a valid argument.
The second time I read it, I remembered: Bnei Brak.
Post a Comment