Thursday, June 25, 2020

Twitter and Facebook are worthy adversaries - don't regulate them!

There's always been a suspicion, occasionally backed up by anecdotal evidence, that the social media giants Twitter and Facebook have been skewing the balance of power in public discourse toward the Left, by "shadowbanning", censoring right-leaning posts, and occasionally even banning conservative users for seemingly minor infractions, while taking no action against similar or worse offences from people on the Left.

Lately, it seems they've thrown away all pretence of even-handedness: Twitter, in particular, has been taking down account after account of conservative commentators, even placing a "call to violence" warning on President Trump's pledge to enforce the law on mobs of anarchists and arsonists.


And, on the Facebook side, Project Veritas recently released an exposé of systemic anti-Right bias in Facebook.

On the other side, woke activists are doxxing anyone they can, shaming, boycotting, and getting people fired wherever they can - with no consequences, even for completely fabricated accusations. Forgiveness for past offences is extended only to public figures who now identify with the Left (e.g. Jimmy Kimmel), and the slightest apostasy is a cardinal sin (e.g. JK Rowling).

This has led to many calls from people on the Right to regulate social media, to ensure that their narrative is not censored by unaccountable activists from the Left.

Let me state unequivocally: I am opposed to regulating social media. And I think it is rank hypocrisy from the supposed believers in the free market, suddenly to recant their principles and call for government to get involved in this issue.

Last I checked, Facebook and Twitter were independent corporations, beholden only to the law of the land. They are not public property, and their owners are free to do with them as they see fit. Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg are brilliant people, who built up hugely successful corporations by harnessing the power of the masses. And, so it appears now, they have chosen to weaponize their corporations in this election year, in the cause of unseating Donald Trump.

And it is 100% their right to do so. Try to understand this: a very large percentage of the Left views Trump as Hitler. If you were a German in the 1930's, and you ran a corporation with the power of Twitter or Facebook, wouldn't you see it as your civic and moral duty to turn the full force of your organization to removing Hitler from power?

Now, of course, the people on the Right who disagree with this view of Trump are deeply offended by it, and feel utterly betrayed and used by these corporations. But the fact remains: when you signed up on their platforms, you agreed to operate on their terms. (That was in the small print you didn't bother to read when you checked "I Agree".) And if their terms turn out to include discrimination against conservative views, well, sorry, but that's part of the deal.

And I say to Twitter and Facebook: Well played. You have been beating us conservatives, fair and square, and I salute you as worthy adversaries.

So what is the conservative world to do?

Firstly, dry your tears. Stop being snowflakes complaining about systemic bias, and accept it as fact. Now, adjust your strategies accordingly. If you want a platform to express yourself without fear of cancellation, try Locals or Parler. But these platforms lack the reach (for now) that Twitter and Facebook have. So, if you want to take advantage of these platforms' massive audiences, then play by their rules. Yes, you will be fighting uphill - but that's the lie of the land right now. The enemy has the high ground, and you now have to come up with new tactics to deal with this situation.

It's not my place to offer any specific suggestions of tactics; I'm not a social media strategist; I'm not even American. But your battle is important to me, because America is the greatest bastion of freedom in the world, and I am deeply troubled by the way it appears to be crumbling under an anarchist/Marxist/Alinskyite assault, tacitly supported by a major political party.

God bless you for fighting the good fight, on behalf of the rest of the free world.

Tuesday, June 16, 2020

The committee to eliminate unsafe language

"Thank you for joining me here at such short notice," said Emma. All of the heads around the table nodded acknowledgement, except for the two that the others were pretending not to notice.

"As you all know," Emma continued, "GitHub has announced that they will henceforth be changing the name of their primary code branch from 'master' to 'main', in order to avoid using racially-charged language." She paused for effect. "I think we can all agree that this puts us under a lot of pressure."

Brett looked confused. "Why is that? Isn't that, like, a good thing?"

Emma rolled her eyes. "Try to keep up, Brett. GitHub are a bunch of nerds and geeks. How does it look if they're more woke than us artists?"

"Yeah", agreed Kylie. "We gotta do something about that."

"Exactly!" Emma slapped her hand on the table. "We need to go up a level. We need to identify and root out all the racist, sexist, and other offensive terms in everyday language. And we need it by six o' clock today."

"Why so soon?" asked Brett. 

"Because that's the deadline for today's news cycle at my station," said Emma, with a condescending smile. "If we leave it longer, it'll lose its impact in relation to the GitHub story. Dustin, you can get this into your news site by tonight, too, right? Ok, so let's get started. What words can you think of that might offend someone?"

Brett swore.

"Wassa matter, Brett?" said Kylie.

"Nothing," said Brett. "Just, you asked what words might offend someone, so I said that word."

Emma slammed the table with her fist. "Jesus, you privileged s----for-brains douchebag, we're looking for words that might offend minorities!"

"I got one," said Dustin. "'Supermarket'. It evokes the days when Black slaves were sold like cattle in a market. We should remove that word from our language, and instead call it a 'store', or a 'superstore'."

"Good, good," mumbled Emma, making notes on her iPad. "What else?"

"How about 'manual'?" suggested Kylie. "People always tell you to 'read the f--- manual'. It's so, like, mansplaining, and it's like a dog whistle for sexists."

"Um...the word 'manual' is from the Latin for 'hand'...it's got nothing to do with men," ventured Brett hesitantly. "I know this, coz I did Latin for my Literature major."

"Yeah, like the Romans weren't a male-dominant society of slave-owners?!" countered Kylie. "We shouldn't use any terms that come from their oppressive language!"

"That would be...like...the whole English--"

But Brett's reply was cut off by Dustin. "I'm offended by the term 'family'. It has historical connotations of suppression of LGBTQ people, and imposition of binary gender options. We should rather call it a 'loving unit', or, like, come up with a new term that conveys this, like, 'lovunit'."

A hush fell over the room for a few seconds, aside from a faint slurping sound coming from the corner that everyone else was steadfastly trying to ignore. "Dustin...that is absolutely genius!" exclaimed Emma. "This will be totally transformative of our whole society! Out with 'families'; in with 'lovunits'!"

"Yeah!" exclaimed Kylie. "I'm gonna write my next song about that!"

"Let's see those privileged geeks at GitHub top this!"

There was a general chorus of approval and excitement. With the wind in their sails, the team set to work, compiling a formidable collection of words to be eliminated from the English lexicon, including "police", "mail", and "trump". 

Brett looked over the fruits of their labor proudly. "This is going to be the most awesome blacklist, like, ever!"

An awkward silence ensued. Emma, Dustin, and Kylie were staring at Brett with looks of horror and revulsion.

"What?" said Brett. "Did I say something wrong?"

Emma's face curled into a snarl. "Get. Out. Of. Here. You...racist!"

Brett turned white and jumped to his feet. "No! I'm not a racist! I love black people! Really!"

"OUT!" screeched Emma, also on her feet now. Brett looked to Dustin and Kylie for support, but found none in their angry scowls. Head bowed, he slowly shuffled out the door.

In the silence that followed, Dustin shot a furtive, awkward look at the two people who had not yet participated in the discussion, then spoke up. "I just have to say, Heather, I am right now finding your body language very threatening."

Heather pulled her lips away from Trevon's with a loud sucking sound. When Trevon tried to re-engage, she touched her finger playfully to his nose. "Not now, honey, they're talking to me."

Trevon looked at the other people in the room, as if he had just noticed them now. "Oh, hey guys."

Heather turned to Dustin. "Did you say something to me?"

Dustin lowered his eyes to the table and flushed red. "I said, I am right now finding your body language very threatening."

Heather's face dropped. "Oh, hey, Dustin, I'm so sorry; I really didn't mean anything. I should have realized my hetero PDA would be offensive to you because you're gay."

"I'm not gay," said Dustin sheepishly. "I just...broke up with my girlfriend a week ago, and I'm feeling...sensitive about it."

"You're not gay?" exclaimed Emma, aghast. "Damn, and I thought you were so cool. Well, even if we don't have a gay, at least we have a person of color here in this focus group." She turned to Trevon with a saccharine-sweet smile. "Trevon, I'm so happy Heather brought you. What do you think of our list of unacceptable vocabulary? When you think about a world without all these threatening terms, does it make you feel more..safe? More respected?"

Trevon hesitated. "Well...I wasn't really..." He glanced at his watch. "Oh s---, is that the time?!" he exclaimed, leaping to his feet. "Stupid f--- n---! I'm gonna be late for my nuclear physics class!" And still cursing himself loudly, he charged across the room and disappeared through the door.

The four remaining people looked at each other.

"So," said Emma. "We're on for six o' clock release, then?"